Am I just being too cynical, or is this as silly a statement as it is sounding to me right now:
The committee is composed of trustees, senior administrators, communications staff and principals.
Their research has identified safety, uniforms, sports, academics, school proximity and busing, and values as key reasons for the enrolment migration or failure to attract students.
The StAR committee has developed recommendations intended to level the student recruitment and retention playing field.
I dunno. This seems fairly obvious, no? They needed a committee to figure this out?