These campaigns of misinformation must stop.

The CAQ put out yet another press release today, damning school boards in the province of Quebec.

CAQ spokesperson Nathalie Roy chastises the Minister of Education, Marie Malavoy, in the communiqué suggesting that the Minister is hiding behind school boards in order to affect a tax increase.   Ms Roy claims that school boards “have not shown the decency to publish a scenario where taxes are raised”.  Ms Malavoy suggests that these cuts can come from administrative services, but that would be our choice as school boards to make.

Words matter.  Facts matter.  And unfortunately, both Ms Roy and Ms Malavoy are the ones truly deceiving the Quebec taxpayers.

Our school board has yet to pass a resolution on where to assess the latest cuts, yes THE CUTS to the school board. So no, we have not yet published anything. Because a decision has not yet been reached.  Should the school board be tossing about scenarios that could apply? That are likely to never see the light of day? Responsible governance dictates that we should not.

Let’s take a moment to look at the facts here.  The issue at hand is the “reduction rate” applied to school taxes.  In our school board, we have over 130 municipalities, each with their very own “reduction rate”.  These rates range from as low as 8.83% (Village St Pierre) to as high as 49.71% (Labelle).  The “reduction rate” was originally introduced by the government a number of years ago, to help defray the massive increases taxpayers were seeing as municipal evaluations skyrocketed.  The actual formulae for the municipalities remain a mystery to me – it is said to be complex, and by the way, as an English school board, we have no decision making power anyway – this rate is in fact decided on by the Franco school boards.  (Isn’t that a nice little bonus for us English boards?)

This monstrosity is just a minor piece in what is the single most bloated bureaucratic waste of a tax system this world could ever imagine.

Theoretically, our school board should be taxing at $0.36/$100 evaluation in order to meet the “taxation envelope” that the Ministry allocates to us.

The law does not allow us to tax more than $0.35/$100, so with a total municipal evaluation of $8.8 billion, to get to the $32 million “envelope”, we would need to tax at $.3636/$100 – we are not allowed more than $0.35/$100, so we have to tax at that top end and the Ministry makes up the $1 million dollar balance that we are unable to collect to meet that “envelope” of $32 million.

Now – back to the “reduction rate”.  Ms. Malavoy has indicated that for the 2013/2014 year, 50% of the value of the reduction rate will be removed. That means the school board gets $3.5 million dollars less.  Now – the Minister has said that we can tax that amount by reducing the reduction rates by that same 50%, or that we can “find them in administration”, as long as it doesn’t come from services that directly affect students and learning.

Some questions:  Do you know what percentage of our school board’s budget is taken up by school board administration?  Under 4%.  Do you know what the average percentage is on the Franco side?  Around 7%.  Do you know what other social services allocate to their administrative costs?  Some are said to be higher than 10%.  And more.  At under 4% in our school board, we simply have no where else to cut.

Most recently, parents committees in the province have started a petition on the Quebec National Assembly website, demanding that the province invest in education.  The parents know that academic perseverance and success are crucial to the development of a healthy, committed and prosperous society; why doesn’t our Government reflect that in its investment in education?!

(Sign the petition yourself after clicking here.)

So – what do we do?  What choices do we have?  And when is it time to demand real leadership from both Ms. Malavoy and Ms. Roy?  When is it time to stand up and say, “NO.  THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE.  We have no where else to cut, and it’s time we look at the bureaucracy behind all of this.”

I say that time is NOW.

Let’s talk about the number of bureaucrats employed by MELS.  Let’s look at their functions, and the actual value they deliver to our students.  Let’s examine how the bureaucracy created by MELS affects school board administration, our in-school administrators and our teachers.  Let’s look at the tax system – does it make any sense to be  taxing this way? Managing reduction rates, having duplications of taxation services throughout the province and then trying to balance it all out?

Why not a single line item on municipal taxes, the same for us all and collected by the municipal system already in place?

And while we are looking at tax rates, let’s finally address the absolute theft from English tax payers who are having to pay as much as 3, 4 or 5 times the school tax rate of their Franco neighbours, to get exactly the same level of funding for their English schools. This is outright financial discrimination against English taxpayers in Quebec – is there any justice at all in not addressing this right now?!

Ms. Roy – your focus is incorrect and your hubris has a rank smell to it.  Ms. Malavoy – your attempts to download cuts that shouldn’t be made to school boards and hence increase taxes on the taxpayers are both transparent and destructive to the future of this province.

As a taxpayer, I demand that both of you focus on the real problems in front of us, and that you direct our tax dollars into the future of this province by funding our school boards adequately such that they can deliver the high quality education they are certain to deliver.

Truly,

Steve

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Blogging, Commentaries, Education

2 responses to “These campaigns of misinformation must stop.

  1. luc

    The 5% administrative costs that are now being reported by most school boards is highly suspect. It does not include all the hidden administrative professional contracts that are given to outside sources. Retired administrators etc. It does not include all the administrative deductions made from all services provided for student services programs. There are more ways to hide administrative expenses anonymously within a school board budget then there are hidden termites in a termite mound. The very fact that most school boards are all of a sudden reporting 5% admin costs across all regions of Quebec is suspect by itself. Collusion is probably a more apt word. Your attempt to create a schism between English boards and French school boards around the current linguistic and cultural nationalism furor is unfortunate and rather opportunistic. It is another good reason for eliminating the political element from school boards by the creation of educational service centers.

    • avoteforthefuture

      I would love to know on what *facts* you report that the administrative costs are “suspect”.

      “Hidden professional contracts”? Sorry, no.
      “Administrative deductions made from all services …” ?? Sorry, no.

      Hidden termites? The only hidden termites here are the facts that are clearly hidden from your understanding of the real situation.

      Collusion? You live in an odd world, where facts don’t matter, I guess. There is no collusion. There is accounting. We add the numbers up, and we report on them. That’s called math. Not collusion.

      And there is absolutely no attempt to create any schism. Simply reporting facts. I related same to other public bodies as well.

      Listen, it’s really unfortunate that you are blinded by your hate of school boards. So much so that facts no longer matter.

      I believe that the site you run is of great value. You’re quick to gather links to important stories. But again – why don’t you come to one of our public meetings and ask some questions. Get some answers. Look at the facts. I am on the inside of what is happening at our school board. I am dealing in fact. I see what goes on – I am part of a Council that is responsible for overseeing what goes on, in fact. We ask questions. We delve deep. Our administrators provide answers. Wholesale transparency is what we have – top to bottom. So – how does that reconcile with your … suspicions? I am dealing in fact. You are dealing in suspicion.

      It’s really that simple. No collusion. No hidden contracts. No administrative deductions. The odd retired employee, when it is the best choice that we have in front of us. Yes – when it is the best choice. Nothing “highly suspect”. It’s pretty simple, really.

      Truly,

      Steve

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s